linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake "Revsion" -> "Revision"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1497350662.18751.13.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 03:44:22 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Srikanth Jampala <Jampala.Srikanth@...ium.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][crypto-next] crypto: cavium: fix spelling mistake
 "Revsion" -> "Revision"

On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:40 +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On 13/06/17 11:36, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 09:52 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> > > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > > 
> > > Trivial fix to spelling mistake in seq_printf message
> > Fixing spelling typos is a good thing, but is it a
> > good thing to change possibly API dependent output
> > in seq_ calls?
> Considering it's in -next and has not landed in upstream I supposed it
> was better to fix it now before it landed in Linus' repo.

Good call, thanks.

> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c b/drivers/crypto/cavium/nitrox/nitrox_main.c
> > 
> > []
> > > @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ static int nitrox_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> > >  	struct nitrox_device *ndev = s->private;
> > >  
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "NITROX-5 [idx: %d]\n", ndev->idx);
> > > -	seq_printf(s, "  Revsion ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > > +	seq_printf(s, "  Revision ID: 0x%0x\n", ndev->hw.revision_id);
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "  Cores [AE: %u  SE: %u]\n",
> > >  		   ndev->hw.ae_cores, ndev->hw.se_cores);
> > >  	seq_printf(s, "  Number of Queues: %u\n", ndev->nr_queues);