lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:52:38 +0200
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node



On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>> [...]
>>>
>>> Dear Matthias,
>>>
>>> Could you take this patch together with
>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
>> something?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1]
>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
> 
> Dear Matthias,
> 
> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
> 
> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 

You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding 
description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?

Regards,
Matthias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ