[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9198053a46999b0b46dcab992527d0d7@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:33:59 -0700
From: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@...eaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Using __always_inline attribute
On 2017-06-14 03:06, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Prasad,
>
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Sodagudi Prasad wrote:
>> With a variant of a CLANG(based on 4.0) following errors observed on
>> Linux
>> 4.12-rc5 tag.
>
> How are you building the kernel with clang, btw? I'd be keen to try the
> same
> thing, but I thought the LLVMLinux project was largely dead at his
> point. Do
> you still need build system patches, or is this now integrated with
> Kbuild?
Hi Will,
Trying clang patches from below tree -
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common/+/experimental/android-4.4-llvm
>
>> net/built-in.o: In function `__xchg_mb':
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: \
>> undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99'
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:99: \
>> undefined reference to `__compiletime_assert_99
>>
>> Clang does not seems to be marking this macro as inline and causing
>> above
>> compilation issue due to BUILD_BUG().
>
> The only BUILD_BUG I see around here is if the size parameter (which is
> calculated using sizeof) is not known to be 1,2,4 or 8 at compile time.
> It
> would be interesting to know which call site is confusing clang in this
> way
> and what code is actually being emitted here.
>
> If it's just that __xchg_mb isn't being inlined into the __xchg_wrapper
> macro, then your patch should be ok, but I'd like to be sure it's not
> something else. I'm also surprised you haven't see this crop up in
> other
> places.
After digging further, we observed that inline definition was changed
recently and causing this issue.
Here is missing part of inline macro definition __attribute__((unused)).
Commit abb2ea7dfd82 ("compiler, clang: suppress warning for unused
static inline functions") have redefined the inline macro as below
#define inline inline __attribute__((unused))
But actual definition of inline macro defined compiler-gcc.h file as
shown below.
#define inline inline __attribute__((always_inline))
notrace
As always_inline attribute is missing in inline definition, compile may
not inline macros __xchg_mb in
arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h file and leading to error.
Some compilers may not honor inline as inline if always_inline attribute
is removed because of
-inline-threshold compiler options.
Here is the change to fix this issue-
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
index d614c5e..a0e6433 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler-clang.h
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@
* directives. Suppress the warning in clang as well.
*/
#undef inline
-#define inline inline __attribute__((unused)) notrace
+#define inline __attribute__((always_inline)) __attribute__((unused))
notrace
-Thanks, Prasad
>
> Will
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists