[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170614230518.GA4518@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:05:18 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...sity.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>,
Mike Christie <mchristi@...hat.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com,
reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/31] ext4: reserve space for xattr entries/names
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:23:26AM -0700, Tahsin Erdogan wrote:
> New ea_inode feature allows putting large xattr values into external
> inodes. struct ext4_xattr_entry and the attribute name however have to
> remain in the inode extra space or external attribute block. Once that
> space is exhausted, no further entries can be added. Some of that space
> could also be used by values that fit in there at the time of addition.
>
> So, a single xattr entry whose value barely fits in the external block
> could prevent further entries being added.
>
> To mitigate the problem, this patch introduces a notion of reserve in
> the
> external attribute block that cannot be used by value data. This reserve
> is enforced when ea_inode feature is enabled. The amount of reserve is
> arbitrarily chosen to be min(block_size/8, 1024). The table below shows
> how much space is reserved for each block size and the guaranteed
> mininum
> number of entries that can be placed in the external attribute block.
>
> block size reserved bytes entries (name length = 16)
> 1k 128 3
> 2k 256 7
> 4k 512 15
Why not just spill the values into their own ea_inodes if we need the
space? I guess that has the disadvantage that now we need to reserve
quite a few more journal credits ((1 inode block, 1 bbitmap block, 1
ibitmap block, 1 data block) * nr_inline_values) just in case we end up
spilling all the values.
--D
> 8k 1024 31
> 16k 1024 31
> 32k 1024 31
> 64k 1024 31
>
> Signed-off-by: Tahsin Erdogan <tahsin@...gle.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/xattr.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> index 3ad1fc62cbf0..c9579d220a0c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> @@ -1428,6 +1428,12 @@ static int ext4_xattr_inode_lookup_create(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Reserve min(block_size/8, 1024) bytes for xattr entries/names if ea_inode
> + * feature is enabled.
> + */
> +#define EXT4_XATTR_BLOCK_RESERVE(inode) min(i_blocksize(inode)/8, 1024U)
> +
> static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
> struct ext4_xattr_search *s,
> handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
> @@ -1487,6 +1493,20 @@ static int ext4_xattr_set_entry(struct ext4_xattr_info *i,
> ret = -ENOSPC;
> goto out;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * If storing the value in an external inode is an option,
> + * reserve space for xattr entries/names in the external
> + * attribute block so that a long value does not occupy the
> + * whole space and prevent futher entries being added.
> + */
> + if (ext4_has_feature_ea_inode(inode->i_sb) && new_size &&
> + (s->end - s->base) == i_blocksize(inode) &&
> + (min_offs + old_size - new_size) <
> + EXT4_XATTR_BLOCK_RESERVE(inode)) {
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.13.1.508.gb3defc5cc-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists