lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497433402.930.56.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:43:22 +0800
From:   Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:24 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 14/06/17 03:11, Jun Gao wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 15:45 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/06/17 15:23, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 14:52 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote:
> >>>>>>>> From: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao <jun.gao@...iatek.com>
> >>>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>      arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi    | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>      2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
> >>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Could you take this patch together with
> >>>>>>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss
> >>>>>> something?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Matthias
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2
> >>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
> >>>>> "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> >>>>> "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> >>>>> "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
> >>>>> "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding
> >>>> description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx?
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>
> >>> Dear Matthias,
> >>>
> >>> I mean fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description. Is it OK?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Then I can't see the difference between what you are asking for and what
> >> is already pushed to the repository. Please send a patch, that will make
> >> things clearer.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Matthias
> > 
> > Dear Matthias,
> > 
> > like this:
> > 
> > diff:
> >   Required properties:
> >     - compatible: value should be either of the following.
> > -      (a) "mediatek,mt6577-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
> > -      (b) "mediatek,mt6589-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
> > -      (c) "mediatek,mt8127-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8127 i2c.
> > -      (d) "mediatek,mt8135-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8135 i2c.
> > -      (e) "mediatek,mt8173-i2c", for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
> > +       "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
> > MT2701
> > +       "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
> > +       "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
> > +       "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek
> > MT7623
> > +       "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173
> >     - reg: physical base address of the controller and dma base, length
> > of memory
> >       mapped region.
> >     - interrupts: interrupt number to the cpu.
> > 
> 
> Please look at [2], this is already staged.
> 
> [2] 
> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1

Dear Matthias,

base on [2]
diff:
"mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701
-  "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for i2c compatible with mt6577 i2c.
-  "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for i2c compatible with mt6589 i2c.
-  "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for i2c compatible with
mt7623 i2c.
-  "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for i2c compatible with mt8173 i2c.
+  "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577
+  "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589
+  "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623
+  "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173


Thanks!



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ