[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CzM2c_LD0MWHwj5RLdANnxdTzoL0G0uO1NKUiRZR0BEdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:07:32 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected
#PF is async_pf
2017-06-14 2:55 GMT+08:00 Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>:
> 2017-06-12 23:08-0700, Wanpeng Li:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>
>> Add an async_page_fault field to vcpu->arch.exception to identify an async
>> page fault, and constructs the expected vm-exit information fields. Force
>> a nested VM exit from nested_vmx_check_exception() if the injected #PF
>> is async page fault.
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -2422,13 +2422,28 @@ static void skip_emulated_instruction(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> static int nested_vmx_check_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned nr)
>
> This function could use the same treatment as vmx_queue_exception(), so
> we are not mixing 'nr' with 'vcpu->arch.exception.*'.
>
>> {
>> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
>> + u32 intr_info = 0;
>> + unsigned long exit_qualification = 0;
>>
>> - if (!(vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << nr)))
>> + if (!((vmcs12->exception_bitmap & (1u << nr)) ||
>> + (nr == PF_VECTOR && vcpu->arch.exception.async_page_fault)))
>> return 0;
>>
>> + intr_info = nr | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK;
>> + exit_qualification = vmcs_readl(EXIT_QUALIFICATION);
>
> This part still uses EXIT_QUALIFICATION(), which means it is not general
> and I think it would be nicer to just do simple special case on top:
>
> if (vcpu->arch.exception.async_page_fault) {
> vmcs_write32(VM_EXIT_INTR_ERROR_CODE, vcpu->arch.exception.error_code);
> nested_vmx_vmexit(vcpu, EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI,
> PF_VECTOR | INTR_TYPE_HARD_EXCEPTION |
> INTR_INFO_DELIVER_CODE_MASK | INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK,
> vcpu->arch.cr2);
> return 1;
> }
Good point.
>
> Using vcpu->arch.cr2 is suspicious as VMX doesn't update CR2 on VM
> exits; isn't this going to change the CR2 visible in L2 guest after a
> nested VM entry?
Sorry, I don't fully understand the question. As you know this
vcpu->arch.cr2 which includes token is set before async pf injection,
and L1 will intercept it from EXIT_QUALIFICATION during nested vmexit,
why it can change the CR2 visible in L2 guest after a nested VM entry?
>
> Btw. nested_vmx_check_exception() didn't support emulated exceptions at
> all (it only passed through ones we got from hardware),
I think so.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists