[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170614144623.2flddavcbbcedtsv@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:46:23 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Shaikh, Azhar" <azhar.shaikh@...el.com>
Cc: "jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com" <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
"tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 12:51:25AM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 12:50 AM
> > To: Shaikh, Azhar <azhar.shaikh@...el.com>
> > Cc: jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com; tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net;
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell systems
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Shaikh, Azhar wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jarkko Sakkinen [mailto:jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2017 4:14 AM
> > > > To: Shaikh, Azhar <azhar.shaikh@...el.com>
> > > > Cc: jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com;
> > > > tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net;
> > > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] tpm: Enable CLKRUN protocol for Braswell
> > > > systems
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:46:33PM -0700, Azhar Shaikh wrote:
> > > > > To overcome a hardware limitation on Intel Braswell systems,
> > > > > disable CLKRUN protocol during TPM transactions and re-enable once
> > > > > the transaction is completed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Azhar Shaikh <azhar.shaikh@...el.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes from v1:
> > > > > - Add CONFIG_X86 around disable_lpc_clk_run () and
> > > > > enable_lpc_clk_run() to avoid
> > > > > - build breakage on architectures which do not implement
> > > > > kmap_atomic_pfn()
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes from v2:
> > > > > - Use ioremap()/iounmap() instead of
> > > > kmap_atomic_pfn()/kunmap_atomic()
> > > > > - Move is_bsw() and all macros from tpm.h to tpm_tis.c file.
> > > > > - Add the is_bsw() check in disable_lpc_clk_run() and
> > > > > enable_lpc_clk_run()
> > > > > - instead of adding it in each read/write API.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes from v3:
> > > > > - Move the code under #ifdef CONFIG_X86 and create stub functions
> > > > > for everything else
> > > > > - Rename the functions disable_lpc_clk_run() ->
> > > > > tpm_platform_begin_xfer() and
> > > > > - enable_lpc_clk_run() -> tpm_platform_end_xfer()
> > > > > - Remove wmb()
> > > >
> > > > The wrong parameter order in outb() is not worth of mentioning in
> > > > your opinion?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oh yes! It is definitely worth mentioning. I forgot to mention that.
> > > Will definitely mention it in the changelog for the next version if any or will
> > re send v4 with updated changelog for v3.
> > >
> > > > Related.
> > > >
> > > > I looked again the kmap version of the patch and still cannot figure
> > > > out what could be wrong. Obviously the wrong outb() cause unexpected
> > behavior.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have chances to grab klog from kmap version with correct outb?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have not tried the kmap version with corrected outb(). Will give that a try.
> > >
> > > > /Jarkko
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
>
> Even with the corrected outb(), kmap version fails to boot. Could not get boot logs :-(
>
> > /Jarkko
Lets go with the ioremap() version for now.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists