linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHv2 2/2] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170614150410.GA15806@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 17:04:10 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        yanmin.zhang@...el.com, trenn@...e.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 2/2] Implement sysfs based cpuinfo for x86 cpus.

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:33:01PM +0200, Felix Schnizlein wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Felix Schnizlein <fschnizlein@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.com>
> ---

I know I reject flat-out any patch without a changelog text.

And you NEVER can add a whole new feature without any text here at all,
that's just crazy...

Also, I almost never review RFC patches, as obviously the submitter
doesn't think they are ready to be merged, so why should I review them
just yet?  :)

thanks,

greg k-h