lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497464128.18751.59.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 11:15:28 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
        Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] staging: lustre: lustre: several over 80 characters
 cleanups

On Wed, 2017-06-14 at 11:01 -0400, James Simmons wrote:
> Cleanup many of the over 80 characters reported by checkpatch

Please don't let checkpatch get in the way of lustre
readability.

lustre commonly uses very long identifiers.
Long identifiers and 80 columns don't mix well.

It might be simpler to declare in some document that
lustre uses lines of up to whatever length and require
that checkpatch should be used with the --max-line-length
option when run on lustre code.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ