linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: wire up sleep control configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170614185458.3vhuhjdpf5pabsis@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 20:54:58 +0200
From:   Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65910: wire up sleep control configuration

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 06:15:18PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 05:13:29PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:42:08PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:25:13PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > > References: 201cf052810d20814a77ca0e0045a2c1a3508a1f
> 
> > > I have no idea what you mean by this, sorry.
> 
> > This is a commit id which introduced the feature:
> 
> Please include human readable descriptions of things like commits and
> issues being discussed in e-mail in your mails, this makes them much
> easier for humans to read especially when they have no internet access.
> I do frequently catch up on my mail on flights or while otherwise
> travelling so this is even more pressing for me than just being about
> making things a bit easier to read.
> 
> I also still don't entirely know what you're trying to tell me with
> this...  as far as I can tell it's just noise?

As the patch only modifies device-tree binding, I included reference
to a patch that implements the feature. I guess this is not of much
use to you if you don't have access to the git tree while reviewing.

Since this is rather easy to find in git history, I will just remove the
References line.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław