linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170614191231.GA3645@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:12:31 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for
 default cycles event

Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:06:01PM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:45:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > >  triton:~/tip> perf report --stdio
> > >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported

> so it's a maximum-features build, right?

looks  like
 
> Here's the unwind libraries:
> 
> triton:~/tip> dpkg -l | grep unwind
> ii  libunwind-dev   1.1-4.1ubuntu2  amd64  library to determine the call-chain of a program - development
> ii  libunwind8      1.1-4.1ubuntu2  amd64  library to determine the call-chain of a program - runtime
> ii  libunwind8-dev  1.1-4.1ubuntu2  amd64  library to determine the call-chain of a program - development
 
> libunwind-dev is installed it appears.
 
> Let me know if you want me to run other tests.

Couldn't reproduce so far :-\ I am trying it on a docker container with
Ubuntu 16.04, is that the version you're using, seems to be the 16.04,
at least the packages above listed are the same as in my container...

Also it would be nice to see if this is something introduced by Jiada's
patch:

Author: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@...tor.com>
Date:   Sun Apr 9 20:02:37 2017 -0700

    perf tools: Fix build with ARCH=x86_64

---------------------------

I.e.  the other patch in my perf/urgent branch, does this warning go
away if you apply just the first patch in my perf/urgent branch as of
now?

Here is my testing:

root@...4d7c06d56:/# perf record -F 10000 --call-graph dwarf sleep 5
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.118 MB perf.data (14 samples) ]
root@...4d7c06d56:/# perf report --stdio --dsos '[kernel.kallsyms]' 2>&1 | head -20
# To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only options.
#
# dso: [kernel.kallsyms]
#
# Total Lost Samples: 0
#
# Samples: 14  of event 'cycles:ppp'
# Event count (approx.): 1085705
#
# Children      Self  Command  Symbol                        
# ........  ........  .......  ..............................
#
    28.16%     0.00%  sleep    [k] page_fault
            |
            ---page_fault
               do_page_fault
               __do_page_fault
               handle_mm_fault
               |          
               |--17.82%--__handle_mm_fault
root@...4d7c06d56:/# grep Ubuntu /etc/os-release 
NAME="Ubuntu"
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS"
root@...4d7c06d56:/#

- Arnaldo

- Arnaldo