[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170614160120.577a6385@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:01:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Hawkins <whh8b@...ginia.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Ftrace vs perf user page fault statistics differences
On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:47:17 -0400
Will Hawkins <whh8b@...ginia.edu> wrote:
> > That's how trace-cmd parses it.
>
> In the kernel version that I am running (again, pretty old) I do not
> have this file. I do, however, have
It may be due to the kernel version. It gets the functions
from /proc/kallsyms. That could have have an issue. Although, I have
this too:
# grep per_cpu_start /proc/kallsyms
0000000000000000 A __per_cpu_start
But I don't see it being converted in my report.
Hmm, it's not saved. Interesting:
trace-cmd report -f
to see the list of saved functions. I need to figure out why it does
for you, but not for me.
>
> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/exceptions/page_fault_user/format
>
> and the contents are:
>
> name: page_fault_user
> ID: 79
> format:
> field:unsigned short common_type; offset:0; size:2; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_flags; offset:2; size:1; signed:0;
> field:unsigned char common_preempt_count; offset:3; size:1;signed:0;
> field:int common_pid; offset:4; size:4; signed:1;
>
> field:unsigned long address; offset:8; size:8; signed:0;
> field:unsigned long ip; offset:16; size:8; signed:0;
> field:unsigned long error_code; offset:24; size:8; signed:0;
>
> print fmt: "address=%pf ip=%pf error_code=0x%lx", (void
> *)REC->address, (void *)REC->ip, REC->error_code
>
> Again, this looks like exactly what I would expect since address has
> the cr2 value in that function. Plus, we know that the raw value is
> correct. I suppose that the "symbolification" of that value is done in
> trace-cmd, right? So, perhaps that is where I should start looking for
> the problem?
>
> I definitely want to follow up on this and help where I can. That
> said, I think I am satisfied with "our" (really, your) answer to the
> original problem.
It has something to do with the reading of the function names
in /proc/kallsyms.
Ah, I bet it's a change in the kernel. A recent update to trace-cmd was
to ignore functions in kallsyms of type "A" (which you can see is what
I have above).
What do you have when you do:
sudo grep per_cpu_start /proc/kallsyms
May or may not need sudo depending on if the kernel lets non root have
access to kallsyms.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists