linux-kernel - Re: qemu sparc64 runtime crashes in -next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170614204231.GA3783@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 13:42:31 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     pasha.tatashin@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bob.picco@...cle.com, steven.sistare@...cle.com
Subject: Re: qemu sparc64 runtime crashes in -next

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:31:08PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 03:13:54 -0700
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > my sparc qemu tests started failing with next-20170613.
> > Log output is not very helpful:
> > 
> > Unhandled Exception 0x0000000000000028
> > PC = 0x00000000004620f4 NPC = 0x00000000004620f8
> > Stopping execution
> > 
> > It looks like 0x00000000004620f4 is in init_tick_ops().
> > 
> > Bisect points to commit 'sparc64: improve modularity tick options'.
> > Bisect log is attached.
> > 
> > No idea if this is a qemu problem. If you think it is, anything to
> > help
> > tracking it down would be appreciated.
> 
> Pavel, please look into this.
> 
> It looks weird that the commit it bisects to would cause a problem.
> Maybe the change from __read_mostly to __cachelin_aligned causes the
> issue?
> 
> Really weird...

Turns out tick_get_frequency() returns 0. The value is used as divisor
in clocksource_hz2mult().

Looking into it further, clock_tick is initialized much later.

[    0.000000] clock_tick is 0
	-> tick_get_frequency()
[    0.039361] PROMLIB: Sun IEEE Boot Prom 'OBP 3.10.24 1999/01/01 01:01'
[    0.041646] PROMLIB: Root node compatible: sun4u
[    0.060500] Linux version 4.12.0-rc5-next-20170614+ (groeck@...s) (gcc version 4.6.3 (GCC) ) #5 SMP Wed Jun 14 13:40:01 PDT 2017
[    0.893475] bootconsole [earlyprom0] enabled
[    0.958658] ARCH: SUN4U
[    1.265007] Ethernet address: 52:54:00:12:34:56
[    1.340458] MM: PAGE_OFFSET is 0xfffff80000000000 (max_phys_bits == 40)
[    1.405302] MM: VMALLOC [0x0000000100000000 --> 0x0000060000000000]
[    1.468992] MM: VMEMMAP [0x0000060000000000 --> 0x00000c0000000000]
[    3.349070] Kernel: Using 5 locked TLB entries for main kernel image.
[    3.422093] Remapping the kernel... 
[    4.342159] done.
[  136.231664] OF stdout device is: /pci@1fe,0/ebus@...u
[  136.298896] PROM: Built device tree with 60466 bytes of memory.
[  136.458520] Top of RAM: 0x1fe80000, Total RAM: 0x1fe80000
[  136.520487] Memory hole size: 0MB
[  143.705871] Allocated 16384 bytes for kernel page tables.
[  143.972916] Zone ranges:
[  144.039046]   Normal   [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000001fe7ffff]
[  144.118654] Movable zone start for each node
[  144.180797] Early memory node ranges
[  144.240870]   node   0: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000001fe7ffff]
[  144.333686] Initmem setup node 0 [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000001fe7ffff]
[  144.943918] Booting Linux...
[  145.010966] CPU CAPS: [flush,stbar,swap,muldiv,v9,mul32,div32,v8plus]
[  145.082225] CPU CAPS: [vis]
[  145.581394] percpu: Embedded 12 pages/cpu @fffff8001f800000 s57024 r8192 d33088 u4194304
[  145.949412] ###################### fill_in_one_cpu(): CPU 0 clock tick set to 100000000

That doesn't really take 145 seconds, though :-).

Guenter