lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Jun 2017 23:52:37 +0300
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the
 sound-asoc tree

Hi Rob,

Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:54 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   drivers/of/base.c
>>
>> between commits:
>>
>>   4c9c3d595f1b ("of_graph: add of_graph_get_remote_endpoint()")
>>   0ef472a973eb ("of_graph: add of_graph_get_port_parent()")
>>   ac1e6958d3be ("of_graph: add of_graph_get_endpoint_count()")
>>
>> from the sound-asoc tree and commit:
>>
>>   1df09bc66f9b ("of: Move OF property and graph API from base.c to property.c")
>>
>> from the devicetree tree.
>
> Sakari, I forgot about these other changes and the resolution is more
> complex than I want to pass on to Linus. Has the branch I provided
> been pulled in (I guess not since this is the first I've seen of the
> conflict)? We should drop the move for now and do it late in the merge
> window or post -rc1. It can be after your other changes.

Good that this came up now --- I was about to send a pull request to 
Rafael. :-) So no, nothing has been pulled yet that would have included 
the immutable branch you provided.

Regarding the fwnode cleanups through linux-pm on the dt/property-move 
branch --- I'm ok waiting for the next rc1.

After that I'd like to get them in for I have patches for media-tree (of 
which not all are mine) that in turn depend on the fwnode cleanups. 
There still have been surprisingly few conflicts so far.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ