[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615031354.GC16833@WeideMacBook-Pro.local>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:13:54 +0800
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@...il.com>,
qiuxishi@...wei.com, Kani Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com>,
slaoub@...il.com, Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, memory_hotplug: support movable_node for hotplugable
nodes
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 08:45:02AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Mon 12-06-17 12:28:32, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:23:18PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> >From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> >
>> >movable_node kernel parameter allows to make hotplugable NUMA
>> >nodes to put all the hotplugable memory into movable zone which
>> >allows more or less reliable memory hotremove. At least this
>> >is the case for the NUMA nodes present during the boot (see
>> >find_zone_movable_pfns_for_nodes).
>> >
>>
>> When movable_node is enabled, we would have overlapped zones, right?
>
>It won't based on this patch. See movable_pfn_range
>
Ok, I went through the code and here maybe a question not that close related
to this patch.
I did some experiment with qemu+kvm and see this.
Guest config: 8G RAM, 2 nodes with 4G on each
Guest kernel: 4.11
Guest kernel command: kernelcore=1G
The log message in kernel is:
[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
[ 0.000000] DMA [mem 0x0000000000001000-0x0000000000ffffff]
[ 0.000000] DMA32 [mem 0x0000000001000000-0x00000000ffffffff]
[ 0.000000] Normal [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000023fffffff]
[ 0.000000] Movable zone start for each node
[ 0.000000] Node 0: 0x0000000100000000
[ 0.000000] Node 1: 0x0000000140000000
We see on node 2, ZONE_NORMAL overlap with ZONE_MOVABLE.
[0x0000000140000000 - 0x000000023fffffff] belongs to both ZONE.
My confusion is:
After we enable ZONE_MOVABLE, no matter whether it is enabled by
"movable_node" or "kernelcore", we would face this kind of overlap?
Finally, the pages in the overlapped range be belongs to which ZONE?
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists