[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZAUK37JYnPwVRuBA6B67QV+S_BYQ6f=k6_rjw__ypTxBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:21:43 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@...nedev.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] ARM: dts: imx6ul-isiot: Add Sound card with codec node
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 08:17:04PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 11:32:07PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> >> From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
>> >>
>> >> Add support for Sound card and related codec(via i2c1) nodes
>> >> on Engicam Is.IoT MX6UL variant module boards.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
>> >> Cc: Matteo Lisi <matteo.lisi@...icam.com>
>> >> Cc: Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> Changes for v3:
>> >> - Replace fsl,imx-audio-sgtl5000 and use simple-audio-card
>> >> Changes for v2:
>> >> - Use proper [label:] node-name[@unit-address] for codec
>> >> - Remove incorrect codec property 'wlf,shared-lrclk'
>> >> - Remove 'gpr' from sound card node
>> >>
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi | 10 +++++++
>> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-isiot.dtsi | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >
>> > Can you help me understand how these two files are related? Why is
>> > sgtl5000 added into one and sound node added into the other?
>>
>> lcdif, ts and sound card which may differ based on the base-board
>> connected with SOM, So I moved these stuff which are related to
>> Starter kit supported once's and used with SOM dts files. if some
>> other board with same SOM can have different lcdif and etc so they can
>> define locally to dts.
>
> I do not follow how these stuff are organized. So far we have the
> following isiot dts files.
>
> - imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi
> - imx6ul-isiot.dtsi
> - imx6ul-isiot-emmc.dts and imx6ul-isiot-nand.dts
>
> How are they mapping to SoM and base-board?
isiot is a modules class, with that emmc and nand are two separate
SOM's. the current support is for mounting these SOM's on Development
base board[1]. So, for isiot module class we have imx6ul-isiot.dtsi
and emmc and nand SOM's have imx6ul-isiot-emmc.dts and
imx6ul-isiot-nand.dts. There are some Carrier boards[1] which were
used with different lcdif and other changes, So
imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi have changes common across emmc and nand,
instead of adding them into individual dts files I moved in
-common.dtsi. So in future if isiot SOM mounted on carrier board
which should have a separate dts and which may or may not use
imx6ul-isiot-common.dtsi
[1] https://www.engicam.com/vis-prod/101142
[2] https://www.engicam.com/vis-prod/101128
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki
Senior Linux Kernel Engineer | Amarula Solutions
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists