[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615083226.GA4649@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:32:26 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Sleeping BUG in khugepaged for i586
On Wed 14-06-17 18:12:06, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > collapse_huge_page
> > pte_offset_map
> > kmap_atomic
> > kmap_atomic_prot
> > preempt_disable
> > __collapse_huge_page_copy
> > pte_unmap
> > kunmap_atomic
> > __kunmap_atomic
> > preempt_enable
> >
> > I suspect, so cond_resched seems indeed inappropriate on 32b systems.
> >
>
> Seems to be an issue for i386 and arm with ARM_LPAE. I'm slightly
> surprised we can get away with __collapse_huge_page_swapin() for
> VM_FAULT_RETRY, unless that hasn't been encountered yet.
I do not see what you mean here or how is it related.
__collapse_huge_page_swapin is called outside of
pte_offset_map/pte_unmap section
> I think the cond_resched() in __collapse_huge_page_copy() could be
> done only for !in_atomic() if we choose.
in_atomic() depends on having PREEMPT_COUNT enabled to work properly AFAIR.
I haven't double checked and something might have changed since I've
looked the last time.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists