[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170615101441.GI31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:14:42 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: mszeredi@...hat.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, jlayton@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/27] proc: Add fs_context support to procfs [ver #5]
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:17:43PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> int pid_ns_prepare_proc(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> {
> + struct proc_fs_context *ctx;
> + struct fs_context *fc;
> struct vfsmount *mnt;
> + int ret;
> +
> + fc = vfs_new_fs_context(&proc_fs_type, NULL, 0, FS_CONTEXT_FOR_NEW);
> + if (IS_ERR(fc))
> + return PTR_ERR(fc);
> +
> + ctx = container_of(fc, struct proc_fs_context, fc);
> + if (ctx->pid_ns != ns) {
> + put_pid_ns(ctx->pid_ns);
> + get_pid_ns(ns);
> + ctx->pid_ns = ns;
> + }
> +
> + ret = vfs_get_tree(fc);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + put_fs_context(fc);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> - mnt = kern_mount_data(&proc_fs_type, ns);
> + mnt = kern_mount_data_fc(fc);
> + put_fs_context(fc);
Same as with ipc; do you need to go through dynamic allocation,
container_of, patching it up, etc.?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists