linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 089/108] kernel/watchdog: prevent false hardlockup on overloaded system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170615175341.403333686@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Jun 2017 19:53:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
        Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 089/108] kernel/watchdog: prevent false hardlockup on overloaded system

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>


[ Upstream commit b94f51183b0617e7b9b4fb4137d4cf1cab7547c2 ]

On an overloaded system, it is possible that a change in the watchdog
threshold can be delayed long enough to trigger a false positive.

This can easily be achieved by having a cpu spinning indefinitely on a
task, while another cpu updates watchdog threshold.

What happens is while trying to park the watchdog threads, the hrtimers
on the other cpus trigger and reprogram themselves with the new slower
watchdog threshold.  Meanwhile, the nmi watchdog is still programmed
with the old faster threshold.

Because the one cpu is blocked, it prevents the thread parking on the
other cpus from completing, which is needed to shutdown the nmi watchdog
and reprogram it correctly.  As a result, a false positive from the nmi
watchdog is reported.

Fix this by setting a park_in_progress flag to block all lockups until
the parking is complete.

Fix provided by Ulrich Obergfell.

[akpm@...ux-foundation.org: s/park_in_progress/watchdog_park_in_progress/]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481041033-192236-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@...izon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/nmi.h   |    1 +
 kernel/watchdog.c     |    9 +++++++++
 kernel/watchdog_hld.c |    3 +++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/nmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/nmi.h
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ extern int watchdog_user_enabled;
 extern int watchdog_thresh;
 extern unsigned long watchdog_enabled;
 extern unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits;
+extern atomic_t watchdog_park_in_progress;
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 extern int sysctl_softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace;
 extern int sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace;
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ unsigned long *watchdog_cpumask_bits = c
 #define for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu) \
 	for_each_cpu_and((cpu), cpu_online_mask, &watchdog_cpumask)
 
+atomic_t watchdog_park_in_progress = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
+
 /*
  * The 'watchdog_running' variable is set to 1 when the watchdog threads
  * are registered/started and is set to 0 when the watchdog threads are
@@ -260,6 +262,9 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_tim
 	int duration;
 	int softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace = sysctl_softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace;
 
+	if (atomic_read(&watchdog_park_in_progress) != 0)
+		return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
+
 	/* kick the hardlockup detector */
 	watchdog_interrupt_count();
 
@@ -467,12 +472,16 @@ static int watchdog_park_threads(void)
 {
 	int cpu, ret = 0;
 
+	atomic_set(&watchdog_park_in_progress, 1);
+
 	for_each_watchdog_cpu(cpu) {
 		ret = kthread_park(per_cpu(softlockup_watchdog, cpu));
 		if (ret)
 			break;
 	}
 
+	atomic_set(&watchdog_park_in_progress, 0);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
--- a/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
@@ -84,6 +84,9 @@ static void watchdog_overflow_callback(s
 	/* Ensure the watchdog never gets throttled */
 	event->hw.interrupts = 0;
 
+	if (atomic_read(&watchdog_park_in_progress) != 0)
+		return;
+
 	if (__this_cpu_read(watchdog_nmi_touch) == true) {
 		__this_cpu_write(watchdog_nmi_touch, false);
 		return;