[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac107cb7-8551-7a2c-e1e9-983fdb5241aa@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:01:05 +0530
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
<yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>, Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: add MDIO driver using proper bus
layer
Hi Rafal,
On Friday 16 June 2017 11:41 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 16 June 2017 at 08:04, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 11 May 2017 09:59 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 05/11/2017 06:29 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> @@ -297,6 +371,28 @@ static struct platform_driver bcm_ns_usb3_driver = {
>>>> .of_match_table = bcm_ns_usb3_id_table,
>>>> },
>>>> };
>>>> -module_platform_driver(bcm_ns_usb3_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +static int __init bcm_ns_usb3_module_init(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int err;
>>>> +
>>>> + err = mdio_driver_register(&bcm_ns_usb3_mdio_driver);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + return err;
>>>> +
>>>> + err = platform_driver_register(&bcm_ns_usb3_driver);
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + mdio_driver_unregister(&bcm_ns_usb3_mdio_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> + return err;
>>>> +}
>>>> +module_init(bcm_ns_usb3_module_init);
>>>> +
>>>> +static void __exit bcm_ns_usb3_module_exit(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + platform_driver_unregister(&bcm_ns_usb3_driver);
>>>> + mdio_driver_unregister(&bcm_ns_usb3_mdio_driver);
>>>> +}
>>>> +module_exit(bcm_ns_usb3_module_exit)
>>>
>>> Do we need to keep both platform device and mdio device registration
>>> here? Do you have a depreciation time line for when we can entirely
>>> switch to mdio device (assuming this is for backwards compatibility)?
>>
>> I too have the same question.
>
> My plan is to:
> 1) Get this patch accepted
> 2) Switch DTS files to use the new binding
> 3) Maybe wait for LTS release if we care that much
> 4) Drop old binding support
old dt's are generally not allowed to break. So I'm not sure if we shoud ever
drop old binding support. Rest sounds good.
Thanks
Kishon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists