[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXu=0L9GOB+4DWvSTnXZEeyw551JiJ0uro9eECDx4fX-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:18:38 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Sricharan R <sricharan@...eaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Replace local utlb code with
fwspec ids
Hi Magnus,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> Now when both 32-bit and 64-bit code inside the driver is using
> fwspec it is possible to replace the utlb handling with fwspec ids
> that get populated from ->of_xlate().
Thanks for your patch!
> --- 0013/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c 2017-06-15 18:32:27.580607110 +0900
> static int ipmmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
> struct of_phandle_args *spec)
> {
> - return ipmmu_init_platform_device(dev);
> + iommu_fwspec_add_ids(dev, spec->args, 1);
Does it hurt if iommu_fwspec_add_ids() is called multiple times, as this is
done before the "Initialize once - xlate() will call multiple times" check?
> +
> + return ipmmu_init_platform_device(dev, spec);
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists