lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30100fc8-7538-fd30-0a6a-665019b38c38@milecki.pl>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:14:36 +0200
From:   Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
To:     Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:     Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yendapally.reddy@...adcom.com>,
        Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] phy: bcm-ns-usb3: add MDIO driver

On 06/16/2017 08:36 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Friday 09 June 2017 01:34 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>
>> As explained in the commit 9200c6f177638 ("Revert "phy: Add USB3 PHY support
>> for Broadcom NSP SoC"") this module should be modified to use MDIO bus as
>> this is how PHY is really attached.
>>
>> This should allow reusing this driver on NSP and any other platform with
>> MDIO bus and this particular PHY.
>
> can you run checkpatch and fix all warnings in this series?

I always check my patches before sending. For this set the only warning I
get is:

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#117: FILE: drivers/phy/broadcom/phy-bcm-ns-usb3.c:224:
+                                   usecs_to_jiffies(BCM_NS_USB3_MII_MNG_TIMEOUT_US));

I've problem finding a nice way of fixing this.
1) I can't break the line between arguments as there is only 1 argument
2) I shouldn't use small indention as it would misalign this line
3) Using tmp var for BCM_NS_USB3_MII_MNG_TIMEOUT_US sounds a bit pointless

According to the coding-style.rst having 80+ chars lines is acceptable if it
"significantly increases readability and does not hide information". Maybe
we can just live with this single line like that? Isn't this a bit bike
shedding in this case?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ