[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <05383817-d6a6-9e1d-8866-8a8cbed2507e@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:53:57 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: arm64: next-20170614 panics on boot
On 16/06/17 10:51, Yury Norov wrote:
> (CC irqchip maintainers)
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:33:37PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:08:40PM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today's linux next falls into panic in init_IRQ():
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/irq.c:
>>> 53 void __init init_IRQ(void)
>>> 54 {
>>> 55 irqchip_init();
>>> 56 if (!handle_arch_irq)
>>> 57 panic("No interrupt controller found.");
>>> 58 }
>>>
>>>
>>> Bisecting points to the patch 6fedb069def034 ("of: Provide dummy
>>> of_device_compatible_match() for compile-testing"), but reverting it
>>> doesn't help. It seems like yesterday's linux-next also hangs. Right
>>> now I cannot continue with debugging, but if nothing will get clear,
>>> I'll back to it at this evening.
>>
>> Sorry, forgot to attach the config. This is it. Also, I run arm64 on
>> qemu.
>
> The next-20170616 boots well for me. I didn't manage to bisect the
> source of problem - it points to different commmits, and reverting
> them doesn't help. The source of the problem is that irqchip_init()
> doesn't set the handle_arch_irq. It should be done in
> of_irq_init() at the line
>
> drivers/of/irq.c:
> 542 while (!list_empty(&intc_desc_list)) {
> ...
> 561 ret = desc->irq_init_cb(desc->dev,
> 562 desc->interrupt_parent);
> ...
> 586 }
>
> On next-20170614 and 15 intc_desc_list is empty at the point. It
> should be populated earlier in the loop
> 510 for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, matches, &match)
>
> But np becomes 0 at the 1st iteration, and so the program doesn't enter the
> loop. At the first glance there's no recent changes in related code. Maybe it's dts
> issue?..
Dunno. I'm booting -next as of today in various arm64 VMs, and
everything seems fine. Even 20170614 boots fine in the same
configuration. You'll have to investigate a bit more, I'm afraid.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists