[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1497613434.22624.145.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:43:54 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jslaby@...e.com
Cc: ed.blake@...tec.com, vigneshr@...com, alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com,
yegorslists@...glemail.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Delete dead code for CIR serial ports
On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 17:54 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> Commit e4fda3a04275 ("serial: don't register CIR serial ports") adds a
> check for PORT_8250_CIR to serial8250_register_8250_port(). But the
> code
> isn't needed as the function never takes the branch when the port is
> CIR
> serial port.
> + if (serial8250_isa_config != NULL)
> + serial8250_isa_config(0, &uart->port,
> + &uart->capabilities);
Can't it be one line after all?
>
> + ret = uart_add_one_port(&serial8250_reg,
> + &uart->port);
Ditto.
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = uart->port.line;
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists