linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <654.1497628470@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:54:30 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
        mszeredi@...hat.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, jlayton@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5]

Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:

> (1) Add a new SB field that is like s_flags but for the new flags,

Do we really need to do that?  The SB_* flags are conumeric with the MS_*
flags they replace.

David