lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:22:32 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
        hpa@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, rafael@...nel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] intel_pstate: remove intel_pstate.get()

On Wednesday, June 07, 2017 07:39:14 PM Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> 
> The x86 cpufreq core now uses aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu()
> to supply /sys/.../cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
> on all x86 systems supporting APERF/MPERF.
> 
> That includes 100% of systems supported by intel_pstate,
> and so intel_pstate.get() is now a NOP -- remove it.
> 
> Invoke aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() directly,
> if legacy-mode p-state tracing is enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 16 +---------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index b7de5bd..5d67780 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1597,12 +1597,6 @@ static inline bool intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu, u64 time)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static inline int32_t get_avg_frequency(struct cpudata *cpu)
> -{
> -	return mul_ext_fp(cpu->sample.core_avg_perf,
> -			  cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical * cpu->pstate.scaling);
> -}
> -
>  static inline int32_t get_avg_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu)
>  {
>  	return mul_ext_fp(cpu->pstate.max_pstate_physical,
> @@ -1728,7 +1722,7 @@ static void intel_pstate_adjust_pstate(struct cpudata *cpu, int target_pstate)
>  		sample->mperf,
>  		sample->aperf,
>  		sample->tsc,
> -		get_avg_frequency(cpu),
> +		aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu(cpu->cpu),

I don't think this change is an improvement.

We compute cpu->sample.core_avg_perf anyway and calling aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu()
here means quite a bit of additional overhead.

Besides, the sample->mperf and sample->aperf values here are expected to be
the ones used for computing the frequency.

>  		fp_toint(cpu->iowait_boost * 100));
>  }
>  
> @@ -1922,13 +1916,6 @@ static int intel_pstate_init_cpu(unsigned int cpunum)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned int intel_pstate_get(unsigned int cpu_num)
> -{
> -	struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num];
> -
> -	return cpu ? get_avg_frequency(cpu) : 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void intel_pstate_set_update_util_hook(unsigned int cpu_num)
>  {
>  	struct cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpu_num];
> @@ -2157,7 +2144,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstate = {
>  	.setpolicy	= intel_pstate_set_policy,
>  	.suspend	= intel_pstate_hwp_save_state,
>  	.resume		= intel_pstate_resume,
> -	.get		= intel_pstate_get,
>  	.init		= intel_pstate_cpu_init,
>  	.exit		= intel_pstate_cpu_exit,
>  	.stop_cpu	= intel_pstate_stop_cpu,
> 

Thanks,
Rafael

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ