[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rU_H6Jq7ArjDq1yByrYf1P7nyC4Y8tqkzG585U39MFLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 02:41:39 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iscsi: ensure RNG is
seeded before use
Hi Lee,
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com> wrote:
> It seems like what you are doing is basically "good", i.e. if there is
> not enough random data, don't use it. But what happens in that case? The
> authentication fails? How does the user know to wait and try again?
The process just remains in interruptible (kill-able) sleep until
there is enough entropy, so the process doesn't need to do anything.
If the waiting is interrupted by a signal, it returns -ESYSRESTART,
which follows the usual semantics of restartable syscalls.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists