lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170617000157.GQ31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2017 01:01:57 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] loop: use filp_close() rather than fput()

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 03:02:09PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> When a loop device is being shutdown the backing file is
> closed with fput().  This is different from how close(2)
> closes files - it uses filp_close().
> 
> The difference is important for filesystems which provide a ->flush
> file operation such as NFS.  NFS assumes a flush will always
> be called on last close, and gets confused otherwise.

Huh?  You do realize that mmap() + close() + modify + msync() + munmap()
will have IO done *after* the last flush, right?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ