linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, pmem: Add sysfs notifications to badblocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPcyv4geo4mhj9Ly9ro+uAS0kLNbeGgv+2eUQr1cZbJfhPKQMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:46:58 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:     "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "Knippers, Linda" <linda.knippers@....com>,
        "linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libnvdimm, pmem: Add sysfs notifications to badblocks

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:25 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
>> > Sysfs "badblocks" information may be updated during run-time that:
>> >  - MCE, SCI, and sysfs "scrub" may add new bad blocks
>> >  - Writes and ioctl() may clear bad blocks
>> >
>> > Add support to send sysfs notifications to sysfs "badblocks" file
>> > under region and pmem directories when their badblocks information
>> > is re-evaluated (but is not necessarily changed) during run-time.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>
>> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
>> > Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>
>> > Cc: Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@....com>
>> > ---
>> > v2: Send notifications for the clearing case
>> > ---
>>
>> This looks good to me, I've applied it, but I also want to extend the
>> ndctl unit tests to cover this mechanism.
>
> Right.  For the time being, would you mind to use the attached test
> program for your sanity tests?  It simply monitors sysfs notifications
> and prints badblocks info...  Sorry for inconvenience.
>
> Since I am not familiar with the ndctl unit tests and I am traveling for
> the rest of the month, I may have to look into it after I am back.
>

No worries, I'll take a look at integrating this. Have a nice trip!