linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] switchtec: add link event notifier block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7f59aaf-f525-b03f-7492-9c372bc752b9@deltatee.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:20:00 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-ntb@...glegroups.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Allen Hubbe <Allen.Hubbe@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Kurt Schwemmer <kurt.schwemmer@...rosemi.com>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] switchtec: add link event notifier block



On 16/06/17 11:14 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> You do know about ftrace, right?  It's good to drop debugging code like
> this for "final" versions.

I've never actually used it but maybe I should give it a try. I'll
remove these debug lines.

>> +
>> +	blocking_notifier_call_chain(&stdev->link_notifier, 0, stdev);
>> +}
> 
> Do you really need a notifier call chain?  How many different things are
> going to "hook up" to this?  I ask as they tend to get really messy over
> time while direct callbacks are easier to handle and manage.

Ok, understood. I only expect the one callback at this time so I'll
change it to a single function pointer.

Logan