linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 18 Jun 2017 09:06:49 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     NeilBrown <neilb@...e.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Two fixes for loop devices

On 06/17/2017 10:33 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16 2017, Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
>> On 06/15/2017 11:02 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> Hi Jens,
>>>  one of these is a resend of a patch I sent a while back.
>>>  The other is new - loop closes files differently from close()
>>>  and in a way that can confuse NFS.
>>
>> Are you wanting to get these into 4.12, or defer to 4.13?
> 
> I'm happy either way.  I just want them to land eventually, so I can
> tick them off my list.
> 
> The conversation with Al might result in a different fix for the
> flip_close() problem, but I think that it is still more correct to call
> filp_close(), because what loop is doing is a lot like closing a file
> that it has been writing to.

I'll toss 2/2 in for now for 4.13, please resend the other once the issues
have been ironed out.

-- 
Jens Axboe