[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170618083702.GB26456@lst.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 10:37:02 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/14] dm: add ->copy_from_iter() dax operation
support
> +size_t dax_copy_from_iter(struct dax_device *dax_dev, pgoff_t pgoff, void *addr,
> + size_t bytes, struct iov_iter *i)
> +{
> + if (!dax_alive(dax_dev))
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (!dax_dev->ops->copy_from_iter)
> + return copy_from_iter(addr, bytes, i);
> + return dax_dev->ops->copy_from_iter(dax_dev, pgoff, addr, bytes, i);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dax_copy_from_iter);
Can you remove the fallbacks after this series so that we have
a clean abstraction?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists