[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170619190733.GK12062@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 15:07:33 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, hch@....de, axboe@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, lizefan@...wei.com, Kernel-team@...com,
Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/12] kernfs: add exportfs operations
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 11:17:14AM -0700, Shaohua Li wrote:
> -static int kernfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long magic)
> +static int kernfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long magic,
> + bool enable_expop)
Hmm... can't we make this a KERNFS_ROOT_* flag?
> @@ -229,7 +287,8 @@ const void *kernfs_super_ns(struct super_block *sb)
> */
> struct dentry *kernfs_mount_ns(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,
> struct kernfs_root *root, unsigned long magic,
> - bool *new_sb_created, const void *ns)
> + bool *new_sb_created, const void *ns,
> + bool enable_expop)
Ditto for other cases too.
> --- a/include/linux/kernfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kernfs.h
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ struct kernfs_elem_attr {
>
> /* represent a kernfs node */
> struct kernfs_node_id {
> + /* the layout must match 'struct fid' */
> u32 ino;
> u32 generation;
> } __attribute__((packed));
Can we make it a union between struct fid and u64?
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists