[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170619102307.32daa88d@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 10:23:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>
Cc: Daniel Micay <danielmicay@...il.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kspp tree
Hi Stephen,
On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 13:31:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Kees,
>
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 20:20:47 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm so confused -- isn't this in next? All the build tests I did were
> > against yesterday's -next which includes this from what I can see...
>
> It is in next, but gets merged after the kspp tree ... so, this is when
> inter-tree dependencies are a pain - I can merge the kspp tree later,
> but then you have to remember which trees Linus must merge before you
> send your pull request. That's why we like to have all trees be
> effectively stand alone (as much as possible).
OK, for now I have moved the merging of the kspp tree to after
everything else (except Andrew's quilt series). This will
(unfortunately) hide some dependencies between trees.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists