[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170619080926.GA1374@sanghar>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:09:26 +0100
From: Okash Khawaja <okash.khawaja@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
William Hubbs <w.d.hubbs@...il.com>,
Chris Brannon <chris@...-brannons.com>,
Kirk Reiser <kirk@...sers.ca>, speakup@...ux-speakup.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2 1/3] tty: add function to convert device name to number
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 04:27:42PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This doesn't have actual parameter name.
> Btw, I would drop dev_ suffix completely from parameter (you have it
> in function name).
Good call, thanks.
> > + * Locking: this acquires tty_mutex
>
> ...and releases.
>
> Perhaps it makes sense to describe what it protects (like it's done in
> some functions around).
Yes, will add the description
> > + */
> > +int tty_dev_name_to_number(char *dev_name, dev_t *dev_no)
>
> const char *name, right?
Yes :)
> > + int rv, index, prefix_length = 0;
>
> I would keep returned variable on a separate line and name it like
> other functions do in this file, i.e. ret.
>
> int ret;
Sure
> > + while (!isdigit(*(dev_name + prefix_length)) && prefix_length <
> > + strlen(dev_name) )
> > + prefix_length++;
> > +
> > + if (prefix_length == strlen(dev_name))
> > + return -EINVAL;
>
> Basically, what you need is to get tailing digits, right?
>
> Moreover, there is quite similar piece of code in
> tty_find_polling_driver() you may share.
tty_find_polling_driver does something slightly different. It looks for
digits embedded in a string, so something like kgdboc=ttyS0,115200 where
the digit being sought is 0 after ttyS. So the sanity checks aren't the
same. It also looks for a comma in addition to looking for a number,
which doesn't apply here. Little bit of functionality may be factored
out but that will be too trivial.
While skimming through tty_find_polling_driver, I also noticed that, in
a strict sense, the following check may not be sufficient when name is
prefix of p->name.
if (strncmp(name, p->name, len) != 0)
> > + if (rv) {
>
> > + mutex_unlock(&tty_mutex);
> > + return rv;
>
> I would go with goto style in this function (since it has locking involved).
Sure
>
> > + }
>
> All together kstrtoint() is invariant here as far as I can see and can
> be done out of locking. Also see above comment how to get line index.
Good call, thanks. Think I changed the code afterwards but didn't
notice that kstrtoint no longer needs to be inside the loop and lock.
Best regards,
Okash
Powered by blists - more mailing lists