linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Fix bogus keyboard backlight sysfs interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAd53p4H-4hhCo5iyYgSu9jL=jGqK2ztUtNMXnPYbpH8LySV7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:39:14 +0800
From:   Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
To:     Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Cc:     andy@...radead.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
        dvhart@...radead.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: dell-laptop: Fix bogus keyboard
 backlight sysfs interface

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com> wrote:
> On Monday 19 June 2017 15:36:29 Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> Dell Latitude 3160 does not have keyboard backlight, but there is a
>> sysfs interface for it, which does nothing at all.
>>
>> KBD_LED_ON_TOKEN is the only token can be found. Since it doesn't have
>
> *ON* really?
>
>> KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN or KBD_LED_AUTO_*_TOKEN, it should be safe to assume it
>> does not support keyboard backlight.
>>
>> Models which do not use SMBIOS to control keyboard backlight, also have
>> this issue. Brightness level is 0 on these models. Verified on Dell
>> Inspiron 3565.
>>
>> Reports keyboard backlight is supported only when tokens other than
>> KBD_LED_ON_TOKEN can be found, or brightness level is not 0.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>
>> v2:
>> The only token can be found is actually KBD_LED_ON_TOKEN, which is BIT(5),
>> instead of KBD_LED_OFF_TOKEN. Change commit log accordingly.
>>
>> Use token bit to make the intention more clear.
>> Also consider kbd_mode_levels_count and kbd_info.levels, suggested by
>> Pali Rohár.
>>
>> Use XOR to simplify the bitmask comparison, suggested by
>> Andy Shevchenko.
>>
>>  drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
>> index ec202094bd50..4b21fc982cb0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c
>> @@ -1148,6 +1148,15 @@ static const int kbd_tokens[] = {
>>       KBD_LED_ON_TOKEN,
>>  };
>>
>> +enum kbd_led_token_bit {
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_OFF = 0,
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_AUTO_25,
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_AUTO_50,
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_AUTO_75,
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_AUTO_100,
>> +     KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_ON,
>> +};
>> +
>>  static u16 kbd_token_bits;
>>
>>  static struct kbd_info kbd_info;
>> @@ -1510,7 +1519,12 @@ static void kbd_init(void)
>>       ret = kbd_init_info();
>>       kbd_init_tokens();
>>
>> -     if (kbd_token_bits != 0 || ret == 0)
>> +     /*
>> +      * If brightness level is 0, or KBD_LED_ON_TOKEN is the only token,
>> +      * consider there is no keyboard backlight.
>> +      */
>> +     if ((ret == 0 && (kbd_info.levels || kbd_mode_levels_count)) ||
>> +         kbd_token_bits ^ BIT(KBD_LED_TOKEN_BIT_ON))
>
> So in case there would be only *OFF* token then interface is exported
> too... This does not seems to be good idea.
>
> If there is machine for which firmware provides only *ON* token, then I
> think we should presence for at least two tokens.

So I can use kbd_get_valid_token_counts() >= 2 here.

>
> And similarly kbd_mode_levels_count needs to be checked that is at least
> two (as "off" is in count).

So it should be kbd_mode_levels_count >= 2.
The same rule should also apply to kbd_info.levels, right?

>
>>               kbd_led_present = true;
>>  }
>>
>
> --
> Pali Rohár
> pali.rohar@...il.com