[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87efugutkj.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:04:44 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
bsingharora@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, hbabu@...ibm.com,
linuxram@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 12/12]selftest: Updated protection key selftest
Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com> writes:
> Added test support for PowerPC implementation off protection keys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/pkey-helpers.h | 365 +++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 1451 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/pkey-helpers.h | 219 ----
> tools/testing/selftests/x86/protection_keys.c | 1395 ------------------------
Please split the move and the addition of the powerpc code into two
separate patches (move first). That way we can actually see what you're
doing to add powerpc support.
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists