linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] reset: hide reset control arrays behind struct reset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:36:32 +0530
From:   Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
To:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] reset: hide reset control arrays behind struct
 reset_control

Hi Philipp,


On 06/19/2017 05:48 PM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 12:16 +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> [...]
>>> @@ -102,18 +94,6 @@ static inline struct reset_control *__devm_reset_control_get(
>>>    	return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-ENOTSUPP);
>>>    }
>>>    
>>> -static inline
>>> -int reset_control_array_assert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
>>> -{
>>> -	return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static inline
>>> -int reset_control_array_deassert(struct reset_control_array *resets)
>>> -{
>>> -	return 0;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>>    static inline struct reset_control_array *
>> This has to return just 'struct reset_control *'.
>> That should resolve kbuild errors.
>>
>> Rest looks good to me.
>> Reviewed-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@...eaurora.org>
> Thanks, I had already fixed this locally, prompted by the kbuild test
> robot. I'll send a v6. I would like to merge this patch into the first
> "reset: Add APIs to manage array of resets" patch, if that's ok with
> you.

Thanks.
You are right. It makes more sense to merge these two patches
if Jon finds it okay to put reset_control_array behind reset_control.

I am cool with squashing this patch.


Best regards
Vivek

>
> regards
> Philipp
>

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project