[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <cover.1497877897.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:24:05 -0400
From: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@...hat.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, bfields@...ldses.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2 v5] Fixups for l_pid
LTP fcntl tests (fcntl11 fcntl14 fcntl17 fcntl19 fcntl20 fcntl21) have been
failing for NFSv4 mounts due to an unexpected l_pid. What follows are some
fixups:
v2: - Rebase onto linux-next
- Revert back to using the stack in locks_mandatory_area(), and fixup
patch description for 1/3
v3: - The lkp-robot found some serious per_thread_ops performance
regressions for v1 and v2, so this version changes things around to not
acquire a reference to struct pid in fl_nspid for every lock. Instead,
it drops fl_nspid altogether, and defers the lookup of the
namespace-translated pid until it actually needed.
v4: - Instead of looking up the virtual pid by way of referencing the struct
task of the that pid, instead use find_pid_ns() and pid_nr_ns(), which
avoids a the problem where we race to get a reference to the struct task
while it may be freed.
v5: - Squash previous 2/3 and 3/3 to avoid regression where F_GETLK would
return the init_ns pid instead of a translated pid.
Benjamin Coddington (2):
fs/locks: Use allocation rather than the stack in fcntl_getlk()
fs/locks: Remove fl_nspid and use fs-specific l_pid for remote locks
fs/locks.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
--
2.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists