linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170619155858.xjs5nvdkg42b73vg@ninjato>
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:58:58 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@...opsys.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
        CARLOS.PALMINHA@...opsys.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions

Hiya,

> Believe me I've looked for mistakes like this but I've read the code so many
> times I don't think I can see the obvious anymore.

Yes, I know this. And you worked hard on this slave feature,
acknowledged.

Patches 1-4 look good to me from what I glimpsed. I largely trust here
the *much* appreciated review from Jarkko and Andy. Thanks a lot, guys!

I wonder if we haven't reached a state where Luis just could fix the
buildbot error (missing 'select I2C_SLAVE') and the thing pointed out by
Andy and we handle further small fixes incrementally during the v4.13
cycle? AFAICS there is no major show-stopper, or am I wrong?

Thanks guys,

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)