[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170619164733.dpsojcghd2e3hyqf@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 17:47:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] regulator: include 'enabled' status in
debugfs/regulator_summary
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 06:41:34PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:17:41AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> > > Extend regulator's info line with enabled/disabled status.
> > Why is the use count not enough information here?
> Regulators can be enabled without any users, because of eg. always-on.
We should probably just have always-on be incrementing the use count
instead if it's an issue.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists