linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] kmod: help make deterministic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170620205622.GX21846@wotan.suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 22:56:22 +0200
From:   "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...hat.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        rusty@...tcorp.com.au, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, acme@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
        josh@...htriplett.org, martin.wilck@...e.com, mmarek@...e.com,
        pmladek@...e.com, hare@...e.com, rwright@....com, jeffm@...e.com,
        DSterba@...e.com, fdmanana@...e.com, neilb@...e.com,
        linux@...ck-us.net, rgoldwyn@...e.com, subashab@...eaurora.org,
        xypron.glpk@....de, keescook@...omium.org, atomlin@...hat.com,
        mbenes@...e.cz, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        mingo@...hat.com, alan@...ux.intel.com, tytso@....edu,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] kmod: help make deterministic

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This v3 nukes the proc sysctl interface in favor for just letting userspace
> just check kernel revision. Prior to whenever this is merged userspace should
> try to avoid hammering more than 50 kmod threads as they can fail and it'd
> get -ENOMEM.
> 
> We do away with the old heuristics on assuming you could end up with
> less than max_threads/2 < 50 threads as Dmitry notes this would mean having
> a system with 16 MiB of RAM with modules enabled. It simplifies our patch
> "kmod: reduce atomic operations on kmod_concurrent" considerbly.
> 
> Since the sysctl interface is gone, this no longer depends on any
> other patches, the series is independent. As usual the series is
> available on my linux-next 20170526-kmod-only branch which is based
> on next-20170526.
> 
> [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mcgrof/linux-next.git/log/?h=20170526-kmod-only
> 
>   Luis
> 
> Luis R. Rodriguez (4):
>   module: use list_for_each_entry_rcu() on find_module_all()
>   kmod: reduce atomic operations on kmod_concurrent and simplify
>   kmod: add test driver to stress test the module loader
>   kmod: throttle kmod thread limit

About a month now with no further nitpicks. What tree should these changes
go through if there are no issues? Andrew's, Jessica's ?

  Luis