linux-kernel - [PATCH] kernel/watchdog: fix spurious hard lockups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170620213309.30051-1-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:33:09 -0700
From:   kan.liang@...el.com
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dzickus@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        babu.moger@...cle.com, atomlin@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, eranian@...gle.com, acme@...hat.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/watchdog: fix spurious hard lockups

From: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>

Some users reported spurious NMI watchdog timeouts.

We now have more and more systems where the Turbo range is wide enough
that the NMI watchdog expires faster than the soft watchdog timer that
updates the interrupt tick the NMI watchdog relies on.

This problem was originally added by commit 58687acba592
("lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector").
Previously the NMI watchdog would always check jiffies, which were
ticking fast enough. But now the backing is quite slow so the expire
time becomes more sensitive.

For mainline the right fix is to switch the NMI watchdog to reference
cycles, which tick always at the same rate independent of turbo mode.
But this is requires some complicated changes in perf, which are too
difficult to backport. Since we need a stable fix too just increase the
NMI watchdog rate here to avoid the spurious timeouts. This is not an
ideal fix because a 3x as large Turbo range could still fail, but for
now that's not likely.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <Kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 58687acba592 ("lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and
softlockup detector")
---

The right fix for mainline can be found here.
perf/x86/intel: enable CPU ref_cycles for GP counter
perf/x86/intel, watchdog: Switch NMI watchdog to ref cycles on x86
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9779087/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9779089/

 kernel/watchdog_hld.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog_hld.c b/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
index 54a427d1f344..0f7c6e758b82 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog_hld.c
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ int watchdog_nmi_enable(unsigned int cpu)
 		firstcpu = 1;

 	wd_attr = &wd_hw_attr;
-	wd_attr->sample_period = hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh);
+	wd_attr->sample_period = 3 * hw_nmi_get_sample_period(watchdog_thresh);

 	/* Try to register using hardware perf events */
 	event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(wd_attr, cpu, NULL, watchdog_overflow_callback, NULL);
-- 
2.11.0