linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] NTB bug fixes for v4.12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyghoL++4=b1v6qFV1wN+t6RsQX+oPhxy_w=GmDXFo5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:06:17 +0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-ntb@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] NTB bug fixes for v4.12

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us> wrote:
> Hello Linus,
> Here are a few NTB bug fixes for 4.12.

So I pulled this, mainly because it removed more lines than it added
due to the revert.

But generally I absolutely *hate* pulling stuff that I can see was
committed just hours ago. Why was that branch so recent? It very
obviously cannot have been in any linux-next or 0day or gotten any
other exposure. Is there a reason for that behavior? And if there is,
just include it in the "please pull", because if it wasn't for the
"removes more lines than adds" I probably would just have decided to
ignore this.

               Linus