lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:35:00 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...el.com, paulus@...ba.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 00/12] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys

On 06/20/2017 10:40 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-06-16 at 20:52 -0700, Ram Pai wrote:
>> Memory protection keys enable applications to protect its
>> address space from inadvertent access or corruption from
>> itself.
> 
> I presume by itself you mean protection between threads?

Between threads due to race conditions or from the same thread
because of programming error.

> 
>>
>> The overall idea:
>>
>>  A process allocates a   key  and associates it with
>>  a  address  range  within    its   address   space.
> 
> OK, so this is per VMA?

Yeah but the same key can be given to multiple VMAs. Any
change will effect every VMA who got tagged by it.

> 
>>  The process  than  can  dynamically  set read/write 
>>  permissions on  the   key   without  involving  the 
>>  kernel.
> 
> This bit is not clear, how can the key be set without
> involving the kernel? I presume you mean the key is set

With pkey_mprotect() system call, all the effected PTEs get
tagged for once. Switching the permission happens just by
writing into the register on the fly.

> in the PTE's and the access protection values can be
> set without involving the kernel?

PTE setting happens once, access protection values can be
changed on the fly through register.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ