[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2406.1497947414@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:30:14 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, avagin@...tuozzo.com,
peterz@...radead.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, hpa@...or.com,
gorcunov@...tuozzo.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
mattst88@...il.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, tglx@...utronix.de, rth@...ddle.net,
tony.luck@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] rwsem: Implement down_read_killable()
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> I would have expected to see down_read_killable() actually used somewhere
> after its implementation as part of this patchset.
There are some places we should be using down_{read|write}_interruptible(), if
it existed, dressed as inode_lock{,_shared}_interruptible().
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists