[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <766729e5-b29d-4bf1-0186-3eacbd11f07e@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:31:18 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 2/2] pinctrl: samsung: Fix invalid register offset used
for Exynos5433 external interrupts
On 06/14/2017 03:18 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> When setting the pin function for external interrupts, the driver used
> wrong IO memory address base. The pin function register is always under
> pctl_base, not the eint_base.
>
> By updating wrong register, the external interrupts for chosen GPIO
> would not work at all and some other GPIO might be configured to wrong
> value.
>
> Platforms other than Exynos5433 should not be affected as eint_base
> equals pctl_base in such case.
>
> Fixes: 8b1bd11c1f8f ("pinctrl: samsung: Add the support the multiple
> IORESOURCE_MEM for one pin-bank")
> Cc:<stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Tomasz Figa<tomasz.figa@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski<krzk@...nel.org>
I've tested this patch by comparing GPFx_CON register values, as
nothing seems to be currently using pins from the GPF1...GPF5 banks
as external interrupts on TM2, the only board based on Exynos5433.
I changed sii8620 interrupt-parent temporarily to &gpf1 and GPF1_CON
got configured properly with the patch and improperly without
the patch. I guess this can be considered as
Tested-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
--
Thanks,
Sylwester
Powered by blists - more mailing lists