linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbNPnNbk_r0NWEs4e7PuKmMf9KTjeRPRnxTOHuK-+ki2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 13:38:28 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc:     Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Sascha Weisenberger <sascha.weisenberger@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/10] serial/gpio: exar: Fixes and support for IOT2000

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> On 2017-06-20 10:19, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 8:33 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This makes the gpio-exar driver usable, which was prevented by a number
>>> of fatal bugs, and adds support for the SIMATIC IOT2040 to the 8250-exar
>>> driver and, indirectly, to gpio-exar as well. It's a cross-subsystem
>>> series, so I'm also cross-posting to the serial and gpio lists.
>>>
>>> Changes in v6:
>>
>> I merged some of the patches, that applied. Let's see if they survive
>> in linux-next, else I guess we need to fix this in the -rcs or for the next
>> kernel cycle.
>
> Weird that things did not apply. I just did a cherry-pick for all those
> 10 patches on top of 5c996b7eb52c, and that went smoothly. Please let me
> know which baseline is needed, and I will rebase.

This was on the "devel" branch of my GPIO tree:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-gpio.git/log/?h=devel

Yours,
Linus Walleij