linux-kernel - [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Save pointer to ucode patch for early AP loading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-bd20733045d5db55515442d828376a3a71d6be48@git.kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 20 Jun 2017 06:29:09 -0700
From:   tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de,
        linux@...inikbrodowski.net, mingo@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Save pointer to ucode
 patch for early AP loading

Commit-ID:  bd20733045d5db55515442d828376a3a71d6be48
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/bd20733045d5db55515442d828376a3a71d6be48
Author:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 16:06:26 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:54:25 +0200

x86/microcode/intel: Save pointer to ucode patch for early AP loading

Normally, when the initrd is gone, we can't search it for microcode
blobs to apply anymore. For that we need to stash away the patch in our
own storage.

And save_microcode_in_initrd_intel() looks like the proper place to
do that from. So in order for early loading to work, invalidate the
intel_ucode_patch pointer to the patch *before* scanning the initrd one
last time.

If the scanning code finds a microcode patch, it will assign that
pointer again, this time with our own storage's address.

This way, early microcode application during resume-from-RAM works too,
even after the initrd is long gone.

Tested-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170614140626.4462-2-bp@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index f522415..d525a0b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static struct ucode_patch *__alloc_microcode_buf(void *data, unsigned int size)
 static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 {
 	struct microcode_header_intel *mc_hdr, *mc_saved_hdr;
-	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p;
+	struct ucode_patch *iter, *tmp, *p = NULL;
 	bool prev_found = false;
 	unsigned int sig, pf;
 
@@ -202,6 +202,18 @@ static void save_microcode_patch(void *data, unsigned int size)
 		else
 			list_add_tail(&p->plist, &microcode_cache);
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Save for early loading. On 32-bit, that needs to be a physical
+	 * address as the APs are running from physical addresses, before
+	 * paging has been enabled.
+	 */
+	if (p) {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32))
+			intel_ucode_patch = (struct microcode_intel *)__pa_nodebug(p->data);
+		else
+			intel_ucode_patch = p->data;
+	}
 }
 
 static int microcode_sanity_check(void *mc, int print_err)
@@ -607,6 +619,14 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
 	struct ucode_cpu_info uci;
 	struct cpio_data cp;
 
+	/*
+	 * initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. We will scan the microcode one
+	 * last time before jettisoning and save a patch, if found. Then we will
+	 * update that pointer too, with a stable patch address to use when
+	 * resuming the cores.
+	 */
+	intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
+
 	if (!load_builtin_intel_microcode(&cp))
 		cp = find_microcode_in_initrd(ucode_path, false);
 
@@ -619,9 +639,6 @@ int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
 
 	show_saved_mc();
 
-	/* initrd is going away, clear patch ptr. */
-	intel_ucode_patch = NULL;
-
 	return 0;
 }