lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:37:10 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...eadtrum.com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Xiaolong Zhang <xiaolong.zhang@...eadtrum.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...eadtrum.com>,
        Geng Ren <geng.ren@...eadtrum.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 7/9] clk: sprd: add adjustable pll support

On 06/18, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> index 83232e5..c593a93 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_OF),)
> -obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o
> +obj-y	+= ccu_common.o ccu_gate.o ccu_mux.o ccu_div.o ccu_composite.o ccu_pll.o
>  endif
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6c908e4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum pll clock driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>

Is this include used? Should be clk-provider?

> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +
> +#include "ccu_pll.h"
> +
> +#define CCU_PLL_1M	1000000
> +#define CCU_PLL_10M	(CCU_PLL_1M * 10)
> +
> +#define pindex(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift / (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pshift(pll, member)		\
> +	(pll->factors[member].shift % (8 * sizeof(pll->regs[0])))
> +
> +#define pwidth(pll, member)		\
> +	pll->factors[member].width
> +
> +#define pmask(pll, member)					\
> +	((pwidth(pll, member)) ?				\
> +	GENMASK(pwidth(pll, member) + pshift(pll, member) - 1,	\
> +	pshift(pll, member)) : 0)
> +
> +#define pinternal(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(cfg[pindex(pll, member)] & pmask(pll, member))
> +
> +#define pinternal_val(pll, cfg, member)	\
> +	(pinternal(pll, cfg, member) >> pshift(pll, member))
> +
> +static unsigned long pll_get_refin_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll)

pll could be const?

> +{
> +	u8 shift, index, refin_id = 3;
> +	u32 mask;
> +	const unsigned long refin[4] = { 2, 4, 13, 26 };
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_REFIN)) {
> +		index = pindex(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		shift = pshift(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_REFIN);
> +		refin_id = (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask) >> shift;
> +		if (refin_id > 3)
> +			refin_id = 3;
> +	}
> +
> +	return refin[refin_id];
> +}
> +
> +static u8 pll_get_ibias(unsigned long rate, const u64 *table)
> +{
> +	u64 i;
> +	u8 num = table[0];
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num; i++)
> +		if (rate <= table[i + 1])
> +			break;
> +
> +	return i == num ? num - 1 : i;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +						unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	unsigned long rate, refin, k1, k2;
> +	unsigned long kint = 0, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0];
> +	u32 *cfg;
> +	u32 i;
> +	u32 mask;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++)
> +		cfg[i] = ccu_pll_readl(pll, i);
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_PREDIV))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	if (pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV) &&
> +	    ((pll->fflag == 1 && pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV)) ||
> +	     (!pll->fflag && !pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_POSTDIV))))
> +		refin = refin / 2;
> +
> +	if (!pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_DIV_S))
> +		rate = refin * pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_N) * CCU_PLL_10M;
> +	else {

Please include braces on the if as well when another branch has them.

> +		nint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_NINT);
> +		if (pinternal(pll, cfg, PLL_SDM_EN))
> +			kint = pinternal_val(pll, cfg, PLL_KINT);
> +
> +		mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +		k1 = 1000;
> +		k2 = 1000;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * kint * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> __ffs(mask)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#else
> +		k1 = 100;
> +		k2 = 10000;
> +		i = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +		i = i < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +		rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(refin * (kint >> i) * k1,
> +					 ((mask >> (__ffs(mask) + i)) + 1)) *
> +					 k2 + refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M;
> +#endif
> +	}
> +
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(struct ccu_pll *pll,
> +				   unsigned long rate,
> +				   unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	u32 mask, shift, width, ibias_val, index, kint, nint;
> +	u32 reg_num = pll->regs[0], i = 0;
> +	unsigned long refin, fvco = rate;
> +	struct reg_cfg *cfg;
> +
> +	cfg = kcalloc(reg_num, sizeof(*cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!cfg)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	refin = pll_get_refin_rate(pll);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_PREDIV);
> +	if (width && (ccu_pll_readl(pll, index) & mask))
> +		refin = refin * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_POSTDIV);
> +	cfg[index].msk = mask;
> +	if (width && ((pll->fflag == 1 && fvco <= pll->fvco) ||
> +		      (pll->fflag == 0 && fvco > pll->fvco)))
> +		cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +
> +	if (width && fvco <= pll->fvco)
> +		fvco = fvco * 2;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_DIV_S);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_SDM_EN);
> +	cfg[index].val |= mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	nint  = fvco/(refin * CCU_PLL_1M);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_NINT);
> +	cfg[index].val |= (nint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	width = pwidth(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_KINT);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> +	i = width < 21 ? 0 : i - 21;
> +#endif

What's this? Why do we depend on CONFIG_64BIT?

> +	kint = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(((fvco - refin * nint * CCU_PLL_1M)/10000) *
> +	((mask >> (shift + i)) + 1), refin * 100) << i;
> +	cfg[index].val |= (kint << shift) & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	ibias_val = pll_get_ibias(fvco, pll->itable);
> +
> +	mask = pmask(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	index = pindex(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	shift = pshift(pll, PLL_IBIAS);
> +	cfg[index].val |= ibias_val << shift & mask;
> +	cfg[index].msk |= mask;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < reg_num; i++) {
> +		if (cfg[i].msk)
> +			ccu_pll_writel(pll, i, cfg[i].val, cfg[i].msk);
> +	}
> +

Are we waiting for the writel() to go through above? If so we
need a readl() of the same register to make sure the write has
completed before delaying.

> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long ccu_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +					 unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_recalc_rate(pll, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> +			    unsigned long rate,
> +			    unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	return ccu_pll_helper_set_rate(pll, rate, parent_rate);
> +}
> +
> +static int ccu_pll_clk_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> +{
> +	struct ccu_pll *pll = hw_to_ccu_pll(hw);
> +
> +	udelay(pll->udelay);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static long ccu_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +			       unsigned long *prate)
> +{
> +	return rate;
> +}
> +
> +const struct clk_ops ccu_pll_ops = {
> +	.prepare = ccu_pll_clk_prepare,
> +	.recalc_rate = ccu_pll_recalc_rate,
> +	.round_rate = ccu_pll_round_rate,
> +	.set_rate = ccu_pll_set_rate,
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..66fe5d1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sprd/ccu_pll.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
> +/*
> + * Spreadtrum clock pll configurations
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2015~2017 Spreadtrum, Inc.
> + *
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _CCU_PLL_H_
> +#define _CCU_PLL_H_
> +
> +#include "ccu_common.h"
> +
> +struct reg_cfg {
> +	u32 val;
> +	u32 msk;
> +};
> +
> +struct ccu_bit_field {
> +	u8 shift;
> +	u8 width;
> +};
> +
> +enum {
> +	PLL_LOCK_DONE = 0,

Drop the = 0 please unless it's needed for something?

> +	PLL_DIV_S,
> +	PLL_MOD_EN,
> +	PLL_SDM_EN,
> +	PLL_REFIN,
> +	PLL_IBIAS,
> +	PLL_N,
> +	PLL_NINT,
> +	PLL_KINT,
> +	PLL_PREDIV,
> +	PLL_POSTDIV,
> +
> +	PLL_FACT_MAX
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * struct ccu_pll - defination of adjustable pll clock

s/defination/definition/

> + *
> + * @reg:	registers used to set the configuration of pll clock,
> + *		reg[0] shows how many registers this pll clock uses.
> + * @itable:	pll ibias table, itable[0] means how many items this
> + *		table includes
> + * @udelay	delay time after setting rate
> + * @factors	used to calculate the pll clock rate
> + * @fvco:	fvco threshold rate
> + * @fflag:	fvco flag
> + */
> +struct ccu_pll {
> +	const u32 *regs;
> +	const u64 *itable;
> +	u16 udelay;
> +	const struct ccu_bit_field *factors;

Does this change across the different PLLs? Would be nice to not
need the bit field thing.

> +	u64 fvco;
> +	u16 fflag;
> +
> +	struct ccu_common	common;

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists